If an executive's compensation contract is so sacrosant, then why isn't the contract with the line worker? Why is it ok to break a union contract and throw thousands of workers out into the street but it's not ok to break an executive's contract and deny him millions of dollars in bonuses (we're not talking base salary here) while he is one of the architects of the current "economic crisis?"
Hmmm… could it be because the working stiff can't afford to take a 'Breach of Contract' case to civil court and drag the whole thing right
through to a judgment based on the technical, undeniably accurate aspect of the thing that - no matter how un-just it might seem - the contract's details
have not been faithfully complied with?
Money talks, honest work walks the line.
